Cards on the Table by Agatha Christie
Review of the novel Cards on the Table by
Agatha Christie
Published by Wm. Collins Sons & Co.
Ltd.
First Published: 2 November 1936
Dedication: None
Cost: 25p (UK Paperback 1972)
ISBN: 0 330 02924 X (Paperback Edition – starts
on page 7 - 190 pages)
This is a great story, and partly because it is
a quick read, only 190 pages, but it is quite complex and needs the reader to
unravel the plot as it progresses. This time Agatha Christie uses a Closed
Circle plot to present a murder mystery challenge to her readers. A crime that
must have been committed by a small group of individuals. This is the fifteenth
story featuring Hercule Poirot, but he is without Hastings; replacing him is Superintendent
Battle.
The story opens with Poirot visiting an
exhibition of snuff-boxes at Wessex House in London, He finds time to talk to
Mr Shaitana, a wealthy, but mysterious man. Shaitana is known to be a collector
of rare objects, and has a fascination with crime, particularly murders and the
people who commit them.
Shaitana encourages Poirot to attend one of his
dinner parties, where it is the fashion to play the card game bridge, following
the meal. (For those of you who want to know how to play bridge, I have
included a brief description at the end of the review.)
On the designated evening, guests include four
sleuths – Hercule Poirot, secret agent Colonel Race, mystery writer Mrs
Ariadne Oliver, and Superintendent Battle of Scotland Yard – and four
people in the eyes of Shaitana, are suspected to have murdered in their
past – Dr Roberts, Mrs Lorrimer, young Anne Meredith, and Major Despard.
After dinner, the guests retire to play
bridge – the sleuths play in one room, while the others play in another
room that Shaitana relaxes in. As the evening comes to a close and the sleuths
end their game of bridge, Poirot and Race find that Shaitana had been stabbed
in the chest, with a small dagger from his collection, which has been on
display in the room. As he made a veiled accusation about how murder could be
committed within one's profession, the sleuths suspect one of the other four
guests is the murderer.
After reporting the crime to Scotland Yard, Superintendent
Battle is assigned to the murder investigation. He interviews each of the
suspects, and asked about their movements during the evening, one aspect
becomes clear.
‘It’s difficult,’ he said frankly. ‘I can remember my own
movements, more or less. I got up three times – that is, on three occasions
when I was dummy I left my seat and made myself useful. Once I went over and put
wood on the fire. Once I brought drinks to the two ladies. Once I poured out a
whisky and soda for myself.’
‘Can you remember the
times?’
‘I could only say
very roughly. We began to play about nine-thirty, I imagine. I should say it
was about an hour later that I stoked the fire, quite a short time after that I
fetched the drinks (next hand but one, I think), and perhaps half past eleven
when I got myself a whisky and soda - but those times are quite approximate. I
couldn’t answer for their being correct.’
Each of them denies murdering Shaitana.
In fact, all the sleuths agree it is a
difficult investigation, however, each feels that they have a view as to the possible
solution of the murder. For Poirot, it the bridge score sheets that interests
him, (See pages 38 & 39) as it will establish when each of the four card
players were responsible for the dummy hand and able to leave the table for
drinks and food – and possible murder!
Over the coming days, it is Superintendent Battle
and Poirot that interview the possible suspects and it is here that Christie presents
some red herrings for her reader. She suggests typical murder methods from her
previous stories to distract the reader.
As Poirot delves further into the four suspects'
memory of the bridge game, he begins to establish aspects of their character
and when further murders are committed, he narrows it down to one suspect. They
could remember little of the card game, except for the grand slam that they
made, but they could remember the layout of the room they played in. This was
in direct contrast to what the other suspects recalled. The suspect
continues to go about their daily routine, believing they have the skill to
conceal their murder weapon of choice and the ability to cover-up their crimes,
Although straight forward, the investigation
seems to be going nowhere, so in typical Christie fashion, Poirot invites those
involved to his home to discuss the various aspects of the case and is fortunate
that the murderer is brave enough to attend. Poirot recalls certain points on the
night Shaitana was murdered and the other murders that have happened since and finally
states – with a little bluff - that there is only one individual who could have
committed the murders they are investigating and declares the truth. Although
attempting to wriggle out of the points raised by Poirot, the murder admits his
crime and gives themselves up.
I really like this story. I enjoy playing
bridge and I like the Closed Circle plot and the challenge of trying to solve
the crime before it is declared and feel that this is Christie at her best.
Rating, 5 stars.
Dr Sheppard
11 July 2020
The Game of Bridge
Bridge is a card game played with 4 players
divided into 2 teams of 2 people each. The players sitting across from each
other at the same table form partnerships as North‑South and East‑West. The
two teams are "pairs".
For this moment think of the card game called Trumps. In a pair, whoever is playing the hand is the "declarer" because that person has declared the “trump suit” or has made the hand to be played without a trump suit, which is called "no trump."
The "dummy," which comes from the French word for silent, is the declarer's partner (and takes no part in the game) and places their hand face-up on the table after the “bidding” is done and the “opening lead” is made by the player on declarer's left.
The other two players are the defenders for that hand
For this moment think of the card game called Trumps. In a pair, whoever is playing the hand is the "declarer" because that person has declared the “trump suit” or has made the hand to be played without a trump suit, which is called "no trump."
The "dummy," which comes from the French word for silent, is the declarer's partner (and takes no part in the game) and places their hand face-up on the table after the “bidding” is done and the “opening lead” is made by the player on declarer's left.
The other two players are the defenders for that hand
A bridge deal consists of two phases: bidding
and card play. In the bidding, players bid for
the minimum number of tricks they think they can take to win the deal.
The dealer makes the first call. He is the "opener". Then the auction proceeds clockwise. There may be several bidding rounds. The bidding ends when three players in succession say Pass, meaning that they do not want to bid higher. The final bid becomes the "contract".
The dealer makes the first call. He is the "opener". Then the auction proceeds clockwise. There may be several bidding rounds. The bidding ends when three players in succession say Pass, meaning that they do not want to bid higher. The final bid becomes the "contract".
The purpose of bidding is to relay information about
the strengths and weaknesses of your hand to your partner. It will help you
determine the easiest contract to make based on your respective hands. It is
therefore important to know the meaning of each bid. This is referred to as
"bidding systems and conventions".
During the card play, whoever has played the highest card in the suit wins the trick and leads any card in any suit desired to the next trick.
In a trump contract, if a player doesn't have a card in the suit led, a trump can be played. In that case, he takes the trick unless a higher trump card is played by someone else.
At the end of the game, if the declaring pair takes the number of tricks (or more) it committed to in the initial contract, it scores a certain number of points. But if it does not make its contract, the other pair score points.
No comments:
Post a Comment